Year of significant contrast, says MIA

For the New Zealand red meat sector, the year to June 2012 has been one of significant contrast, given the good prices for many products that were seen early in the financial year, then the steady drop in market prices, particularly for lamb, over the middle six months, says the Meat Industry Association (MIA), in its annual report for the year.

In the foreword to the report, MIA chairman Bill Falconer and chief executive Tim Ritchie note that this volatility, and a further decline in the volume of sheepmeat exports of nearly 27,000 tonnes, has meant the value of the ‘core’ industry exports has reduced this year to just over $6 billion, some $200 million less than for the year ended June 2011.

Highlights during the year included work to strengthen the relationships with the new Ministry for Primary Industries, implementation of the Post-Mortem Inspection reform and the development of a Red Meat Regulatory Strategy.

Halal has been another area of significant MIA activity, with the ongoing implementation of the Halal Notice, while the Ovine Automation Consortium progressed a number of projects, following last year’s commercialisation of the brisket cutter and auto-evisceration robotic systems.

Other research and development projects were progressed through the Meat Research Fund and the Industry Initiatives Fund, ranging from projects measuring energy efficiency in processing plants, through to research into extending the shelf-life of chilled meat – which is of significant interest to the industry given the ongoing volatility and extension of transit times in shipping services.

The long-term forecasts are for meat demand to grow, particularly in Asia, the foreword says. The volatility experienced during the year reinforced the need to continue to implement the recommendations of the Red Meat Sector Strategy “to ensure that we have a strong, sustainable sector that will allow us to be well place to continue to meet the growing long-term demand for high quality, safe protein.”

This article appeared in Food NZ magazine (October/November 2012).

Sustainable Business Network: awards open

Do you have a sustainable champion or project in your organisation?

If you do, or know someone who does, then you’ll be interested to learn that nominations are open for three national awards in this year’s NZI National Sustainable Business Network (SBN) Awards: Social Innovation Award, Sustainability Champion Award and Sustainable Design and Innovation Award.

The NZ National SBN Awards, now in their ninth year, are New Zealand’s pre-eminent sustainability awards, SBN chief executive Rachel Brown says, adding that anyone can nominate individuals or organisations in these three open categories.

“We really encourage people to put their thinking caps on and put forward names of people and organisations that deserve recognition for their efforts in sustainability,” she says.

“The awards recognise leaders in social innovation and individuals who are chamipioning sustainability and new sustainable market solutions. They support savvy organisations that are reshaping their business models for a more sustainable New Zealand. It’s easy to nominate someone via our website and entry is free!”

The awards will be presented at a ceremony at The Cloud, Queen’s Wharf, Auckland on 22 November 2012.

Entries close on Friday 26 October 2012.

For more information or to nominate a person, organisation or companies for these awards click here.

Meat Workers Union must report correct accounts by 12 October

The Registrar of Incorporated Societies, Neville Harris, has given the NZ Meat Workers Union (NZWMU) a deadline of 12 October to provide consolidated accounts for the 2011 financial year, reports meat industry commentator Allan Barber.

The union has been given more time to provide similar details for the previous five years which cover the period since the national union took over the branches which were previously Incorporated Societies in their own right, he writes.

Legally NZMWU is obliged to post its annual accounts by the end of April for the preceding 12 month period and these accounts should consolidate the annual balance sheets and profit and loss statements for the Canterbury, Otago/Southland, Wanganui and Aotearoa branches. However since 2006, the parent union has merely included the net capitation or member subscriptions transferred by the branches to the national union in its annual accounts without reporting total subscriptions, expenses, assets and liabilities.

The only accounts I could trace before 2006 were those of the Aotearoa branch, separately registered as an incorporated society which reported annually to the Registrar of Incorporated Societies. In its last annual report before it disbanded and joined NZMWU as a branch of the main union, it reported total contributions of $1.26 million, expenses of $1.2 million and total assets of just under $1.2 million including term deposits of $961k.

In 2010, NZMWU reported equivalent figures of $712,000 capitation fees, $656,000 expenses and total assets of $1.026 million. Aotearoa branch alone contributed capitation fees of $271,400, compared with the 2005 figure of $1.26 million, although it is understood the membership pre-merger comprised more than just meat workers.

In November last year, I asked the national union and its auditor about this large discrepancy and met a brick wall. I then wrote letters to the Registrar of Incorporated Societies and the Institute of Chartered Accountants asking why the NZMWU was allowed to misreport its total financial accounts.

The official legal position was obtained from the Ministry of Economic Development which administers the annual reporting by incorporated societies to the Registrar in accordance with the 1908 Incorporated Societies Act. The annual filing must be accompanied by a signed certificate which certifies the approval of the annual financial statement by members of the society at a general meeting. These statements do not have to be audited. However, the members must have the opportunity to view and question them and may also elect not to approve the statements, if they are deficient or fail to disclose relevant information.

Where a society has unregistered branches as part of its structure, each branch must supply full financial details for inclusion in the statement submitted to the Registrar. This procedure must follow the rules of the society at all times. But it was in following this procedure where there were serious gaps in NZMWU’s practice.

After following this matter up in the New Year with the Companies Office, I received an assurance that the Registrar would require the posting of correctly consolidated accounts. However, in contrast, the Institute was unimpressed by my persistence, told me the matter had been discussed by its Professional Conduct Committee which found nothing amiss with the auditing of the accounts and considered the matter closed.

So nearly a year after my first enquiry to the Registrar, providing the NZWMU complies with the request to provide correctly prepared accounts for the 2011 year by 12 October, it will be possible to see the actual state of the union’s finances including all branches. It will correct what appears to have been deliberate obfuscation of the NZMWU’s actual financial position.

Another area of doubt concerns the NZMWU’s justification for actually being a union at all, because this requires that it must be an incorporated society, which by definition must have a minimum of 15 members. It claims that it doesn’t have any members which all belong to the branches. However the branches are no longer registered as incorporated societies, hence the justification for not reporting to the Registrar.

When I started this investigation, Graham Cooke, now President of the NZMWU, accused me of talking a load of hogs..t and plotting the demise of unions in collaboration with my former colleagues at AFFCO more than fifteen years ago. To which I replied that I had nothing against a union’s right to represent its members, but I was also strongly of the opinion a union, like any other incorporated society which charges fees to its members in return for provision of services or facilities, has an obligation to comply with all its legal obligations.

It finally looks as though I will get my wish!

The Kiwi dollar will rise further against the greenback

Bank of New Zealand economist Tony Alexander wrote an excellent piece this week and made some interesting observations that he says are important for exporters to understand as they struggle with a high New Zealand dollar. He says the Kiwi dollar is going to rise further against the greenback. He explains his thinking in a cutout from the BNZ’s Weekly Overview.

Hearing loss goes unnoticed

Over half of your plant workers, who think they might have good hearing, could actually have suffered hearing loss, according to a recent US study.

A University of Michigan School of Nursing study of 2,691 people found significant differences between measured and perceived hearing loss, with over half who thought they heard well, found that they had actually lost hearing. Even those with a workplace hearing conservation programme and annual testing may be unaware of their actual hearing ability. The findings are consistent with other studies showing a discrepancy between measured and perceived hearing loss.

The researchers said that healthcare providers need better methods of testing and protecting hearing among factory workers.

Next week is Deaf Awareness Week here in New Zealand, which the National Deaf Foundation Inc (NDF) is using to increase awareness of hearing matters, including bullying of hearing impaired people in the workplace and captioning across the media.

Another campaign being fought by the Foundation relates to the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) tightening up regulations on funding hearing aids for noise-induced hearing lost (typically from exposure to loud machinery or other noisy environments). These set the bar much higher. ACC now deducts an increasing percentage based on age – men aged 57 years and women 65.

“However, research suggests that noise-induced hearing loss can actually speed up age-related hearing loss,” NDF says, adding that the extra costs mean many individuals cannot afford hearing aids. Having exhausted other avenues, NDF will be taking the case to the Human Rights Review Tribunal later this year.

The NFD has some pointers for clear communication with hearing-impaired people in your workplace:

  • Make your face and mouth clearly visible
  • Talk to the person, not to his/her companions
  • Speak slowly – use pauses and don’t shout
  • Rephrase your statement if you are asked to repeat it
  • Use cues to identify a topic, such as “About the warrant of fitness …”
  • Use pen and paper or face and hand movements
  • Don’t make them feel stupid with your response.

MIA signs biosecurity MoU

Last week, the Biosecurity Reform Bill passed into law. As it announced in June, the Government wants primary sector groups to participate in the Government Industry Agreement (GIA) for biosecurity decision-making and cost-sharing. The Primary Production Committee, which was responsible for the final draft of the Bill, received more than 40 submissions.

A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) has been drawn up describing how individual industry groups and Government will develop a business case for participation in joint decision-making and cost-sharing, writes Allan Barber. He finds that, despite initial caution, the Meat Industry Association, has signed the Government’s GIA proposal “provided the value proposition is acceptable.”

Read more …

Blue Sky reconfiguring

Link

Stuff.co.nz reported this week that Blue Sky Meats is looking at reconfiguring its slaughtering shifts to cope with what it says is a sinking industry. About 100 jobs are thought to be on the line. Less stock, extreme weather conditions and a marked shift towards the dairy industry have been blamed for a downturn in Southland’s meat industry, the article says.

 

Latest PGP round opens

The Ministry for Primary Industries is calling for applications for its co-investment fund, the Primary Growth Partnership (PGP).

The PGP is a government-industry initiative launched in September 2009 to invest in significant programmes of research and innovation that will boost the economic growth and sustainability of New Zealand’s primary, forestry and food sectors. It has so far committed nearly $600 million of multi-year funding.

PGP Application Round Eight has just opened, and applications must be received by midday, Tuesday 16 October 2012.

Six applications were received for Round Seven, held in April 2012. Of these, three have been approved by the PGP Investment Advisory Panel to develop and present a business plan (two of them after providing further information); one applicant group has been asked to provide a revised proposal and two were declined.

PGP manager Joseph Montgomery says with several projects from previous rounds already in the pipeline, it is possible that Round Eight could be the last for some time as the PGP fund is close to being fully allocated. “We recognise that the lead times for developing projects can be quite long, so we believe it is fair to signal that the PGP fund is nearing full allocation for the immediate future.”

The Investment Advisory Panel will advise Round Eight applicants of results in mid-December 2012.

Boot camp stimulates insights

The outcome of the Boot Camp, which was held two weeks ago at Stanford University, has not – for obvious reasons – been widely trumpeted, writes industry commentator Allan Barber.

 

After all, the objective was never to produce yet another sector strategy, long on analysis of the problem and short on achievable actions to produce a state of nirvana.

Bill Falconer, chairman of the Meat Industry Association, was chosen as the spokesperson for the Boot Camp because he did not represent a single company, but an industry body. The senior executives who attended did not see the merit of or justification for purporting to speak on behalf of their peers from a wide range of rural sector businesses. Therefore, Falconer was the obvious person to speak on their behalf.

The Boot Camp’s objectives, simply stated, were seen as:

  1. To allow the attendees to learn from the professors and to visit US companies in different industries, which would enable them to see how to become consumer driven.
  2. To take six days out of day -to-day business and examine their business from a different perspective.
  3. To see how or whether individual companies could collaborate to their mutual advantage.

Falconer told me that is was one of the most stimulating and encouraging gatherings he had attended, with 20 CEOs and top managers from across the agricultural sector learning from six outstanding marketing professors how to lift their game for the benefit of their companies, industry sectors and agribusiness as a whole.

The conclusions from the Boot Camp can be looked at against the backdrop of the Government’s growth agenda to double exports or otherwise expressed as lifting exports from 30 percent to 40 percent of GDP by 2025.

The visits to companies near Stanford were immensely helpful in gaining an understanding of how the export target might be achieved. The first important conclusion is that there is no point in increasing production on-farm, or in any other environment for that matter, unless you can sell it.

In order to start working out how to sell the extra production, an understanding of consumer demand is necessary, becoming market- not production-driven and planning how to lift performance accordingly. A major insight was the scale of social media used by all the companies visited, a country mile ahead of any New Zealand company, including Icebreaker, which is seen as a leader in the New Zealand context.

I suspect, although Bill Falconer didn’t say so, that tangible results from the Boot Camp will of necessity be slow to eventuate. Nor is it likely that companies will feel the need to make a lot of noise about any specific programmes they develop, either in collaboration or on their own, until there is something concrete to report.

However, if the Boot Camp has achieved a change in attitude about the nature of the task and provided a blueprint of how to go about lifting sales and marketing performance, this will prove to be the best outcome. There has been too much navel-gazing analysis of the size of the problem and the same old strategies to solve it, without any real change in behaviour.

Ideally, agribusiness needs a Messiah to preach the new marketing gospel until the sector as a whole becomes customer- or consumer-driven.